[Access] Immobility at the Auction
d. maria
mariah at efn.org
Mon Mar 10 15:30:10 CDT 2008
Cindy, you speak my mind... and thnx for the "sitting", but could you
get that foot rest out of my right rib??? Whew, that's better.
Those foot rests are a nuisance! dm
On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Cindy Pitcairn wrote:
> Mary Otten wrote:
>> I wonder if Brian's events committee is going to be involved with
>> events outside church or also
>> those at church, such as the music thing in future years. That would
>> be
>> another avenue for education regarding possible alternative
>> configurations.
> In talking to Brian at the CC, I found out his committee sees its
> primary function as the development of a policy manual based on the one
> used by the Corvallis church. Thus my enthusiasm for doing one tailored
> to our church would duplicate their efforts and most likely not be
> used.
> However, I imagine they are open to including accessibility items in
> their manual.
>
> This raises another question which David mentioned in an e-mail to me
> and which I quote without his permission:
>> We usually think of accessibility as something for people with
>> disabilities -- such as wheelchair users like yourself. But I felt as
>> though the too small space for all the people, exhibits, and
>> activities presented accessibility problems for many people:
>> circulation problems, difficulties in obtaining food and finding some
>> place where one could comfortably eat it, difficulties in seeing
>> auction items on the window-sides of tables or against the windows,
>> and in having sign-up sheets readily at hand, for example.
> Back to Mary:
>> But I do wonder how the heck you could configure a
>> place such that all the people who can stand and talk or browse will
>> do
>> so and yet there will still be room for people who use wheelchairs or
>> walkers to get through and see items.
>>
> This can be done, but it does call for more space to be feasible. At
> the
> PNWD AGM there were some buffets and they presented no accessibility
> problems. When they anticipated not enough space for breakfast seating,
> they asked everyone to find "breakfast buddies" and reach an agreement
> that one would arrive early (7-8 am) and the other later (8-9 am). This
> worked very well. At the most crowded event--the banquet at which
> Rebecca Parker spoke--they announced in advance that it would be
> crowded
> and urged people to come early, but also had usher/greeters at the door
> to help people find a seat. It was crowded but orderly and everyone was
> treated with respect, There was a room with vendors where people were
> browsing and just gathering and chatting and I had no difficulty
> getting
> around. It was a large round room, however.
>
> I think with limited space, perhaps the different activities involved
> in
> an event need to be timed separately. Thus, if the music soiree had
> refreshments after the show instead of during it, there would still be
> an impassable crowd for me in the social hall after the talent show.
> However, there would be more space for seating for everyone in the
> sanctuary without tables set up for eating and I would at least be able
> to take in the show. We can't expect an event to serve several
> different
> functions in one time and place when large numbers of people are
> involved.
>
> Them's my thoughts for the moment.
>
> Cindy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Access mailing list
> Access at uueugene.org
> http://www.uueugene.org
> http://www.uueugene.org/mailman/listinfo/access
>
More information about the Access
mailing list