[Access] Survey (Revised)

[d. maria]

In a year incandescent lighting will be history & not a choice.  dm

On Feb 20, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Robert Kaeser wrote:

> Hi David,
> You and your committee have done a remarkable job here and I would
> hope our new space would incorporate all of the recommendations.  In
> fact that should be a priority.
>
> I do have one question.  Items 20, 21, and k refer to incandescent
> lighting vs florescent vs daylight.  Of course daylight, windows, etc
> are essential for ambience and mood.  The older florescent lights had
> quite an annoying flicker which has been remedied by using phosphors
> with longer decay.  Florescent lights are more energy efficient than
> incandescent as are the metal vapor lights.  What is the advantage of
> incandescent lighting?
>
> Curious bob K
>
> At 08:49 PM 2/19/2008 -0800, you wrote:
>> Here's a final or near-final version of the Accessibility Survey we've
>> been working on. Questions have been reworded, reordered, added, and
>> taken out. Formatting has been tinkered with. I hope you will all give
>> it a green light for going up on the web site, but if you have any
>> quibbles, comments, suggestions, or critiques and want them considered
>> before the survey is viewed by the wider world, please let me know
>> ASAP. Thanks for giving this your time and attention.
>>
>> David
>
> "Science, for its progress, its understanding and so on, depends so
> much on truth and clarity.  And the question is: Are we living in a
> society where truth and clarity are an important element of our
> culture?" --- I. I. Rabi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Access mailing list
> Access at uueugene.org
> http://www.uueugene.org
> http://www.uueugene.org/mailman/listinfo/access
>