[Access] Accessibility - Process Problems

[mary otten]

david,
i agree that having a discussion about broken processes at church with respect to accessibility is a good idea. i'm hoping it is a topic we can raise with the rev, if he comes to our june meeting. i think we could have examples to illustrate where things are broken, but that the idea of a discussion in general, not caused by any one example, is a good thing. but i am skeptical of having that talk at this next cc  session. ken can surely correct me, but i think this next session is going to be seriously dedicated to budget things, so i wonder if there would be time on the agenda for such a discussion.

mary

----- Original Message -----
From: David Gilmartin <Rev.D.Gilmartin at comcast.net>
To: Access and Discussion Issues <access at uueugene.org>
Date: 2008/04/05 17:02:17
Subject: [Access] Accessibility -- Process Problems

>
>
> I think Jeanne-Marie has accurately targeted some of the places where  
> UUCE's process fails to provide accessibility, such as in my effort to  
> have an item on the agenda even though the background information had  
> not been shared in ways that made it accessible to everyone with  
> adequate time for consideration before the meeting. Or the subject of  
> her recent email -- about it appearing that words of some items for  
> Sunday's big celebration will not be accessibly available to all.
> 
> And I think that some progress might be made if the issues and  
> difficulties could be discussed separate from any specific instances.
> 
> Is anyone interested in helping to put this concern into some form for  
> discussion at the upcoming meeting of the Coordinating Council, April  
> 12th?
> 
> David G.
> _______________________________________________
> Access mailing list
> Access at uueugene.org
> http://www.uueugene.org
> http://www.uueugene.org/mailman/listinfo/access